Grosvenor Casino Leicester
Grosvenor Casino Leicester Square
thanks for the advice, have decided to contest this & see what happens from there, have used this site and mse both of which are extremely helpful.
thanks guys.
Will send them a letter to this effect tomorrow:
You issued me with a parking ticket on xx July 2017 which has been unfairly issued.
I decline your invitation to name the driver, which is not required of me as the keeper of the vehicle. I will therefore not be paying your demand for payment for the following reasons:
• There was insufficient signage
I believe that your signs fail the test of 'large lettering' and prominence, as established in ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis. Your unremarkable and obscure signs were not seen by the driver, are in very small print and the terms are not readable to drivers.
• The charge is disproportionate and not a genuine pre-estimate of loss
The amount you have charged is not based upon any genuine pre-estimate of loss to your company or the landowner.
In my case, the £60.00 charge you are asking for far exceeds the cost to the landowner.
I therefore feel the amount you are asking for is excessive.
• The notice to keeper is incorrect
The Notice to Keeper failed to meet the obligations of Schedule 4 of the POFA Act 2012.
There will be no admissions as to who was driving and no assumptions can be drawn.
You must either rely on the POFA 2012 and offer me a POPLA code, or cancel the charge.
Should you obtain the registered keeper's data from the DVLA without reasonable cause, please take this as formal notice that I reserve the right to sue your company and the landowner/principal, for a sum not less than £250 for any Data Protection Act breach.
Your aggressive business practice and unwarranted threat of court for the ordinary matter of a driver using my car without causing any obstruction nor offence, has caused significant distress to me.
I do not give you consent to process data relating to me or this vehicle. I deny liability for any sum at all and you must consider this letter a Section 10 Notice under the DPA. You are required to respond within 21 days. I have kept proof of submission of this appeal and look forward to your reply.
If you choose to pursue me please be aware that I will not enter into any correspondence and this will be the only letter you will receive from me until you answer the specific points raised in my letter.
thanks guys.
Will send them a letter to this effect tomorrow:
You issued me with a parking ticket on xx July 2017 which has been unfairly issued.
I decline your invitation to name the driver, which is not required of me as the keeper of the vehicle. I will therefore not be paying your demand for payment for the following reasons:
• There was insufficient signage
I believe that your signs fail the test of 'large lettering' and prominence, as established in ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis. Your unremarkable and obscure signs were not seen by the driver, are in very small print and the terms are not readable to drivers.
• The charge is disproportionate and not a genuine pre-estimate of loss
The amount you have charged is not based upon any genuine pre-estimate of loss to your company or the landowner.
In my case, the £60.00 charge you are asking for far exceeds the cost to the landowner.
I therefore feel the amount you are asking for is excessive.
• The notice to keeper is incorrect
The Notice to Keeper failed to meet the obligations of Schedule 4 of the POFA Act 2012.
There will be no admissions as to who was driving and no assumptions can be drawn.
You must either rely on the POFA 2012 and offer me a POPLA code, or cancel the charge.
Should you obtain the registered keeper's data from the DVLA without reasonable cause, please take this as formal notice that I reserve the right to sue your company and the landowner/principal, for a sum not less than £250 for any Data Protection Act breach.
Your aggressive business practice and unwarranted threat of court for the ordinary matter of a driver using my car without causing any obstruction nor offence, has caused significant distress to me.
I do not give you consent to process data relating to me or this vehicle. I deny liability for any sum at all and you must consider this letter a Section 10 Notice under the DPA. You are required to respond within 21 days. I have kept proof of submission of this appeal and look forward to your reply.
If you choose to pursue me please be aware that I will not enter into any correspondence and this will be the only letter you will receive from me until you answer the specific points raised in my letter.
Welcome to Grosvenor Casinos, where you can play a wide range of games including poker, blackjack, and roulette. There’s something for everyone – join our online live casino or try your hand at a table game. You can also take part in sports betting on a variety of events, such as football, horse racing, or rugby union. Grosvenor G Casino Leicester The casino in Leicester is a mid size casino. The casino’s official name is Grosvenor G Casino Leicester. The total number of live game tables is 13, which is rather nice.
thanks for the advice, have decided to contest this & see what happens from there, have used this site and mse both of which are extremely helpful.
thanks guys.
Will send them a letter to this effect tomorrow:
You issued me with a parking ticket on xx July 2017 which has been unfairly issued.
I decline your invitation to name the driver, which is not required of me as the keeper of the vehicle. I will therefore not be paying your demand for payment for the following reasons:
• There was insufficient signage
I believe that your signs fail the test of 'large lettering' and prominence, as established in ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis. Your unremarkable and obscure signs were not seen by the driver, are in very small print and the terms are not readable to drivers.
• The charge is disproportionate and not a genuine pre-estimate of loss
The amount you have charged is not based upon any genuine pre-estimate of loss to your company or the landowner.
In my case, the £60.00 charge you are asking for far exceeds the cost to the landowner.
I therefore feel the amount you are asking for is excessive.
• The notice to keeper is incorrect
The Notice to Keeper failed to meet the obligations of Schedule 4 of the POFA Act 2012.
There will be no admissions as to who was driving and no assumptions can be drawn.
You must either rely on the POFA 2012 and offer me a POPLA code, or cancel the charge.
Should you obtain the registered keeper's data from the DVLA without reasonable cause, please take this as formal notice that I reserve the right to sue your company and the landowner/principal, for a sum not less than £250 for any Data Protection Act breach.
Your aggressive business practice and unwarranted threat of court for the ordinary matter of a driver using my car without causing any obstruction nor offence, has caused significant distress to me.
I do not give you consent to process data relating to me or this vehicle. I deny liability for any sum at all and you must consider this letter a Section 10 Notice under the DPA. You are required to respond within 21 days. I have kept proof of submission of this appeal and look forward to your reply.
If you choose to pursue me please be aware that I will not enter into any correspondence and this will be the only letter you will receive from me until you answer the specific points raised in my letter.
thanks guys.
Will send them a letter to this effect tomorrow:
You issued me with a parking ticket on xx July 2017 which has been unfairly issued.
I decline your invitation to name the driver, which is not required of me as the keeper of the vehicle. I will therefore not be paying your demand for payment for the following reasons:
• There was insufficient signage
I believe that your signs fail the test of 'large lettering' and prominence, as established in ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis. Your unremarkable and obscure signs were not seen by the driver, are in very small print and the terms are not readable to drivers.
• The charge is disproportionate and not a genuine pre-estimate of loss
The amount you have charged is not based upon any genuine pre-estimate of loss to your company or the landowner.
In my case, the £60.00 charge you are asking for far exceeds the cost to the landowner.
I therefore feel the amount you are asking for is excessive.
• The notice to keeper is incorrect
The Notice to Keeper failed to meet the obligations of Schedule 4 of the POFA Act 2012.
There will be no admissions as to who was driving and no assumptions can be drawn.
You must either rely on the POFA 2012 and offer me a POPLA code, or cancel the charge.
Should you obtain the registered keeper's data from the DVLA without reasonable cause, please take this as formal notice that I reserve the right to sue your company and the landowner/principal, for a sum not less than £250 for any Data Protection Act breach.
Your aggressive business practice and unwarranted threat of court for the ordinary matter of a driver using my car without causing any obstruction nor offence, has caused significant distress to me.
I do not give you consent to process data relating to me or this vehicle. I deny liability for any sum at all and you must consider this letter a Section 10 Notice under the DPA. You are required to respond within 21 days. I have kept proof of submission of this appeal and look forward to your reply.
If you choose to pursue me please be aware that I will not enter into any correspondence and this will be the only letter you will receive from me until you answer the specific points raised in my letter.
Grosvenor Casino Leicester
Grosvenor Casino Leicester Contact
Grosvenor Casinos is part of the £730 million turnover Rank Group which also operates more than 70 Mecca bingo halls – pretty much all of which are now open. Grosvenor Casino, Leicester has collected 1 reviews with an average score of 5.00. There are 1 customers that Grosvenor Casino, Leicester, rating them as excellent. Grosvenor Casino Rialto Piccadilly is owned and operated by Grosvenor Casinos Limited (a company incorporated in England and Wales under company number 00877080), whose registered office address is TOR, Saint-Cloud Way, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 8BN. To make a table reservation please fill in the form below.